Paper Status Tracking

Article
Author(s)

Bing Ran

Affiliation(s)

Penn State Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, US

ABSTRACT

Based on a comprehensive review on the current research on public participation in environmental policy-making, this paper proposes an important extension to the evaluation model of Germain, Floyd, and Stehman by inclusion of the social learning dimension. The revised framework, this paper shows, is more comprehensive to evaluate public participation in environmental policy-making. The paper applied the proposed evaluative framework in a case study of roundtable discussions in the Department of Environment Protection of Pennsylvania with the conclusion that policy-makers could be informed about the method of evaluating this public participation technique based on the revised framework.

KEYWORDS

public participation, roundtable discussions, evaluation

Cite this paper

Journal of US-China Public Administration, ISSN 1548-6591, April 2012, Vol. 9, No. 4, 407-423

References

Alberts, D. J. (2007). Stakeholders or subject matter experts, who should be consulted? Energy Policy, 35, 2336-2346.

Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2003). Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: A value function approach. Ecological Economics, 45, 75-90.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planning, 35, 216-224.

Aronson, J. (1993). Giving consumers a say in policy development: Influencing policy or just being heard? Canadian Public Policy, 19(4), 367-378.

Barnes, M. (2000). Researching public participation. Local Government Studies, 25(4), 60-75.

Barthol, R. P., & Bridge, R. G. (1968). The ECHO multi-response method for surveying value and influence patterns in groups. Psychological Reports, 22, 1345-1354.

Barthol, R. P., & De Mille, R. (1969). Project ECHO. Santa Barbara, C.A.: General Research Corporation.

Bavelas, A. (1942). A method for investigating individual and group ideology. Sociometry, 5, 371-377.

Beierle, T. C. (1999). Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Review of Policy Research, 16(3-4), 75-103.

Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., & Walker, G. (2002). Transport planning and participation: The rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 61-73.

Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J., & Horsey, B. L. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 60, 726-742.

Coenen, F. H. J. M. (2009). Public participation and better environmental decisions: The promise and limits of participatory processes for the quality of environmentally related decision-making. Enschede, The Netherlands: Springer Press.

Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 76-88.

Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept. Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 421-434.

Desai, U. (1989). Public participation in environmental policy implementation: Case of Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. American Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 49-65.

Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Duimering, P. R., Purdy, L., Safayeni, F., & Scala, J. (1998). Applications of Ashby’s Law of requisite variety to the practice of manufacturing. Proceedings of the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 3, 749-756.

Germain, R. H., Floyd, D. W., & Stehman, S. V. (2001). Public perceptions of the USDA Forest Service public participation process. Forest Policy and Economics, 3, 113-124.

Green, A. J. (1997). Public participation and environmental policy outcomes. Canadian Public Policy, 23(4), 435-458.

Haight, D., & Ginger, C. (2000). Trust and understanding in participatory policy analysis: The case of the Vermont Forest Resources Advisory Council. Policy Studies Journal, 28(4), 739-759.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5, 419-36.

Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.

Koontz, T. M. (2005). We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3), 459-481.

Maier, K. (2001). Citizen participation in planning: Climbing a ladder? European Planning Studies, 9(6), 707-719.

Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164-188.

PA DEP. (2008a). Abandoned Mine Reclamation. Retrieved from http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/ abandoned_mine_reclamation/13961

PA DEP. (2008b). Department of Environmental Protection. Retrieved from http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/ community/dep_home/5968

PA DEP. (2008c). Public Participation. Retrieved from http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/ public_participation/13785

Pattern, S. (2001). Democratizing the institutions of policy-making: Democratic consultation and participatory administration. Journal of Canadian Studies, 35(4), 221-239.

Rauschmayer, F., & Risse, N. (2005). A framework for the selection of participatory approaches forSEA.Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 650-666.

Raymond, L. (2002). Localism in environmental policy: New insights from an old case. Policy Sciences, 35, 179-201.

Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.

Safayeni, F., Yu, A., Purdy, L., & Lee, E. (1992). Assessing the potential of e-mail for engineers: Case study. Journal of Management in Engineering, 8(4), 346-361.

Singleton, S. (2002). Collaborative environmental planning in the American West: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Environmental Politics, 11(3), 54-75.

Smith, P. D., & McDonough, M. H. (2001). Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 239-249.

Steelman, T. A. (1997). The public comment process: What do citizens contribute to national forest management. Journal of Forestry, 1, 22-24.

Steelman, T. A., & Ascher, W. (1997). Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sciences, 30, 71-90.

Stirling, A. (2004). Opening up or closing down: Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne (Eds.), Science, Citizenship and Globalisation (pp. 218-231). London: Zed.

Stirling, A. (2006). Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 95-107.

Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 443-463.

Wellstead, A. M., Stedman, R. C., & Parkins, J. R. (2003). Understanding the concept of representation within the context of local forest management decision making. Forest Policy and Economics, 5, 1-11.

Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F., & Klauer, B. (2006). How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy, 23, 1-9. 

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Coryright © 2015 David Publishing Company All rights reserved, 3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804
Tel: 1-323-984-7526, 323-410-1082; Fax: 1-323-984-7374, 323-908-0457 , www.davidpublisher.com, Email: order@davidpublishing.com