Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
A Comparative Study on the Moral Conceptual Framework of Kohlberg and Wang Yangming
Author(s)
ZHU Mao-ling
Full-Text PDF XML 162 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2177/2018.08.003
Affiliation(s)
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
ABSTRACT
Kohlberg
constructed modern Western moral cognition theory. Wang Yangming proposed the
idea of the extension of intuitive knowledge in Ming Dynasty. We conduct a
comparison on three main conceptual schemes of Kohlberg’s theory—moral
judgment, moral development, and moral behavior—from the following three
aspects: problem consciousness, thinking model, and value idea. Moral cognition
development theory lays emphasis on the core position of cognition to the moral
development, while the idea of intuitive knowledge aims to become sages. From
the point of view of thinking model, moral cognition development theory intents
to conduct moral education for individual moral development, while the idea of
the extension of intuitive knowledge highlights the intuitive knowledge
ontology in the practice of extending the intuitive knowledge to its extremity
and removing the obstacles of selfishness. In terms of value idea, the core
value idea of moral cognition theory is the principle of justice, but the idea
of the extension of intuitive knowledge indicates that the intuitive knowledge
has characteristics of innateness and universality, which is the judgment
principle of the individual transcendentality.
KEYWORDS
Kohlberg, Wang Yangming, moral judgment, moral development, moral behavior
Cite this paper
References